|
 |
 |
Statement Presented to the Congressional-Executive Committee
on China
By Timothy Cooper
Worldrights
Setember 08, 2003
Testimony of Timothy Cooper on the Kidnapping,
Detention, Summary Trial and Sentencing of Dr. Wang Bingzhang
Distinguished representatives of the Congressional Executive Commission on
China: My name is Timothy Cooper, and I am the executive director of
Worldrights, a non-governmental organization dedicated to human rights advocacy
worldwide. I have the honor today to speak to you about the shocking case of Dr.
Wang Bingzhang, who was recently kidnapped, detained, summarily tried and
sentenced to life in prison in China for crimes he did not commit. Unable to
attend these hearings today, Dr. Wang’s family, including his parents, brother,
sisters and children, wish to convey their appreciation to this commission for
its interest in Dr. Wang’s dire and deeply troubling circumstances. For at this
very hour, he languishes in solitary confinement in a Chinese prison cell,
facing the prospect of living out the rest of his life in a 4 x 4 foot
cell.
In many ways, Dr. Wang’s story mirrors that of the thousands of
other well-known and lesser well-known political prisoners, who have also
confronted the brutal ire of the Chinese government for standing up for
universal principles and world rights in the face of severe and sustained
oppression, more frequently than not at the expense of their own freedoms, their
own rights, and yes, even their own lives.
But in other ways, Dr. Wang’s
case is uniquely situated. The government’s calculated treatment of Dr. Wang
appears to mark a new nadir in the annals of political oppression in China.
Indeed, it is Dr. Wang’s family’s contention that the deliberate and
unconscionable actions taken against him by the Chinese government crossed an
important moral and political divide that should raise a series of red flags in
the West and around the world about the direction China’s human rights policies
may be headed.
It is for this reason that the US government— the world’s
champion for the human rights -- should not and must not turn a blind eye to the
fate of Dr. Wang. Having himself stood tirelessly, if not heroically, for the
civil and political rights of 1.2 billion of his own people in China for over
twenty years as an exiled Chinese citizen and a permanent US resident, we
believe that it is morally incumbent upon the United States—and in particular
the United States Congress— to stand with Dr. Wang in his greatest hour of
need.
In June 2002, Dr. Wang and his two companions, Yue Wu and Zhang Qi,
flew to Vietnam to meet with mainland Chinese labor leaders in order to explore
possible venues for cooperation between the overseas pro-democracy movement and
the rising labor movement. The strategic concept was to marry the head of the
democracy movement with the body politic of the fledgling labor movement. Such a
powerful marriage of political convenience would undoubtedly strike unholy
terror in the hearts of Chinese authorities. It is therefore understandable that
the Chinese government would stop at nothing to try to thwart the development of
such a potentially potent strategic alliance.
On June 27, 2002, Dr. Wang,
Yue Wu and Zhang Qi were abducted from their hotel lobby by about ten men,
posing as Vietnamese policemen, only a short time after meeting with a labor
leader in the border town of Mongcai. According to Yue Wu and Zhang
Qi, two of the men spoke with Chinese, not Vietnamese, accents. Told that they
were wanted for questioning at the police station, they were taken to an
awaiting van. Soon they realized they were not being driven into town, but
out-of-town.
They arrived at the Beilun River, where Dr. Wang was
forcibly removed from the van and beaten because he refused to board a boat that
stood waiting for them. Forcibly taken aboard, they were escorted across the
river and into China. Once on shore, the leader of the group revealed a picture
he had with him of Dr. Wang. With satisfaction, he compared the picture with Dr.
Wang’s face. He had found his man, all right.
Later, a new band of men
arrived and took charge. This time they were all Chinese. Dr. Wang
and the others were blindfolded and taken by car to a nearby hotel, where the
“kidnappers” demanded a ten million dollar ransom. Naturally, Dr. Wang, Yue Wu
and Zhang Qi carried no such sum. They provided their captors with family
contact information, including all cell phone numbers. But no family members
were ever contacted. No ransom was ever demanded.
After being
detained in the hotel with papered windows for about a week, Dr. Wang and his
companions were taken to a Buddhist temple near Fangchenggang, in remote Guangxi
province. There their “kidnappers” abandoned them, still bound and without
warning. Moments later, the Chinese police arrived—in the words of the Chinese
authorities—“to rescue” them.
But Dr. Wang, Yue Wu and Zhang Qi found
only continued detention. The three were kept in police custody until the
following day when they were transferred to separate detention centers. There
they were held incommunicado for over five months. All the while, the Chinese
government denied any knowledge whatsoever of their whereabouts.
In
December, the government finally announced that it was, indeed, holding Dr. Wang
and his two companions. Dr. Wang was charged with “espionage” and terrorism.”
The others were set free. Yue Wu returned to Paris in December and Zhang Qi was
placed under house arrest until her return to the US in March.
Meanwhile,
Dr. Wang was summarily tried in a two hour, closed trial. His lawyer received
the case only a week or so before the trial and stated that he had no experience
in such cases. In February, Dr. Wang was sentenced to life in prison for his
alleged crimes of “espionage” and “terrorism,” though no evidence was ever
offered by the Chinese government to support its outrageous allegations. All the
while, Dr. Wang has maintained his innocence. His appeal was later rejected and
Dr. Wang was taken into solitary confinement, where he has remained ever
since.
In July 2003, however, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights issued Opinion No 10/2003, regarding the case of Dr. Wang, Yue Wu
and Zhang Qi. In its written opinion, the UN’s Working Group on Arbitrary
Detention concluded that, among other things, the detention of Dr. Wang, Yue Wu
and Zhang was arbitrary and a violation of international law. It noted that
during Dr. Wang’s first five months in detention, he “did not have knowledge of
the charges, the right to legal counsel, or the right to judicial review of the
arrest and detention: and that, after that date, he did not benefit from the
right to the presumption of innocence, the right to adequate time and facilities
for defence, the right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial
tribunal, the right to a speedy trial and the right to cross-examine witnesses.”
Nor did the UN find any basis for China charges of “espionage” and
“terrorism.”
It concluded its opinion by calling on China to take “the
necessary steps to remedy the situation of Wang Bingzhang and bring it into
conformity with the standards and principles set forth in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.” In other words, it called on China to free
him.
Representatives of the Commission, Dr. Wang was trained as a lung
surgeon. He earned his PhD at McGill University in coronary-arterial research.
Yet, he chose to devote the best years of his life to promoting human rights and
democracy for the people of China, famously stating that "Medicine can only cure
a few patients, but cannot cure the disease of a nation." Now—in ill health
himself, suffering from depression, gastritis, varicose veins and Phlebitis,
without the benefits of Western medicine, he faces the prospect of an
interminable prison sentence in a 4 x 4 ft. cell for crimes that he did
not—could not-- commit.
But as much as he requires medical assistance,
Dr. Wang also requires the generous assistance of the United States
Congress. Dr. Wang’s family respectfully requests that this Congress pass
a joint resolution on his behalf, calling on the Government of the People’s
Republic of China to release him on medical grounds at the earliest possible
date, and to abide by the legal opinion rendered by the United Nations in his
arbitrary detention case. We believe such a resolution would reaffirm America’s
commitment to human rights in China and honor a man who has dedicated his life
to the freedom and human rights of so many others.
Thank you.
|
 |